and good food don't heart.JUDE wrote:S.R.Patch wrote: I feel that if a hound is getting his basic needs, the "stuff" is whats already in the hound, his heart, desire and raw ability.

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett
and good food don't heart.JUDE wrote:S.R.Patch wrote: I feel that if a hound is getting his basic needs, the "stuff" is whats already in the hound, his heart, desire and raw ability.
And any food meeting the canine nutritional standards of AAFCO don't heart or hinder as they all sustain the needs for building and maintaining the heart, liver, kidneys, lungs and brain which is genetically built into the dog not fed into it. Physically having a heart and a brain sustained by a feed does not equal a dog with heart and brains to pursue the game they are bred to pursue regardless of what they are fed. The effects of a food is the result of the ingredients within, be it human or animal which is witnessed by how bad they actually appear rather than how good they seem. Case in point, ALL poultry processors use Chlorine as a disinfectant and the question is how much is enough because the thought process is that if 100 PPM is good then 400 PPM would be better in killing the Salmonella they know for a fact is present on the vast majority of the carcasses. The limit is NOT seen until it obviously has a detrimental impact on the finished product. Chlorine will eventually turn the white coloring of the carcasses yellow and will even have a smell and taste. Is the use of Chlorine in poultry processing detrimental when one can't tell until it has a bad or negative impact? Well, many countries that the U.S. exports poultry to have limits on the use of the common household chemical in the U.S. which is also in our water as a sanitizer as they do NOT accept poultry processed with hyperchlorinated water. Meaning anything outside of the bare minimum of standard drinking water is NOT accepted and so Canada is NOT one of the major poultry importers from the U.S.transman63 wrote:and good food don't heart.JUDE wrote:S.R.Patch wrote: I feel that if a hound is getting his basic needs, the "stuff" is whats already in the hound, his heart, desire and raw ability.
Not trying to impress anyone as I don't have to. You on the other hand made this personal with me and you must think your constant ridicule of someone with much experience is something you need to impress yourself with. It certainly exposes your lack of experience and knowledge of the issue. I've long grown past that period in my life and impressing anyone is and never was a priority with me. NOW, if what you are calling impressing is helping someone with information obtained from a lifetime of experience in a specific area then YES, I'm all that and happy that I am old enough to have actually experienced many, many times those specifics and NOT merely saw it once or read it from an internet article. I actually had mu boots on the floors of these meat and poultry processors and responsible for the "inedible" meat and poultry that was shipped from outside of the plants I inspected under Federal law. If you are talking about grain that is another totally different issue than what I am and have been talking about when it comes to meat and poultry as dry dog food ingredients. The grain ingredients have absolutely NO Federal inspection regulations when used in animal feeds. If they did then how did some feed brands get caught with melamine laced grain being imported from China that killed many dogs and entire kennels? Folks may be told by the company they work for that produces dry pet food and think they have federal regulations but that just isn't the case. If they do then someone will have to show me the regulation because I'm well aware of the USDA regulations and also know that FDA has absolutely no regulations on pet food production and or ingredients. Now, if you are alluding to quality checks, quality specs and certifications that are individual company implemented, then that may be true BUT that is not something regulated by the Federal government at all. Show me on ANY dry dog food package label a statement of approved, accepted or even certified by ANY federal agency. YOU can't as it just don't happen BUT ALL the major pet food manufacturers claim to operate under strict quality control measures and met the AAFCO STANDARDS which is an ASSOCIATION of American Feed Control Officials that merely establish the minimum Nutrient profiles a dog food must meet to apply the AFFCO approval. This is NOT a federal entity nor regulated by one. That is why we continually see recalls from such things in dog food ingredients such as Melamine and aflatoxins. Aflatoxins are caused by mold which may be the corn many of us see piled like mountains in the sky during the peek of the corn harvest. I have witnessed it many, many years at the grain elevator down the road from me. When there storage facilities are full they dump it into huge piles on the ground, cover it in heavy plastic and try to blow air into it BUT I see it molded before they get rid of all of it. They do eventually get rid of ALL of it including the molded stuff. Big business will throw out nothing that will bring a dollar.ohlinger wrote:well the videos they made us watch must have been full of lies when we started our new employee training. and the regulations we had to follow must have been forged...seems maybe you should take charge of the situation...I bow out. You're the man keep up with your novel replies i'm sure you impress someone on this board with them..hahaha.... The grain trucks with the certifications that they came with must have been forged...and our quality lab guys were prbly just sleeping and only there for show.....I mean you've been there right ? Keep on keepin on. Master internet beagler title has been defended.