Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:24 am
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Facts are u can still name your hound anything You want
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
And in a democratic system the majority always rules. That is why our government has three branches, the U.S. supreme court has nine members and almost all groups or committees having jurisdiction over something are comprised of odd numbers. We all may not agree with the decision just as we all do not agree on beagles but when put to the test and voted upon, the majority rules, otherwise we would have a monarchy rather than a republic. EVERYTHING is subject to personal interpretation, likes, taste etc it's just human nature to like what one likes or dislike what one dislikes.Rabbithoundjb wrote:You see wardog there in lyes the problem. Is it discrination or not, is it a person right to choose or not.Thats the problem with the law anything can be blurred. Yesterdays SCOTUS ruling is a prime example. Even though the legislation that was signed into law plainly states the reqirements of the subsidies the majority ruled on their perception of the laws intent and not how the law actually read. There is no letter of the law when it can be rewritten by lawyers and judges everyday. My point is it is simply its discrimination or its not period.
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
I'm sure with-in reason AKC will gladly take our money and let U name them whatever U want . ; )
Randy Vanosdale
LOUDON RIDGE PATCH
KL Vanosdale
http://www.loudonridgepache.com
Home of the tried and true Patch Hound! "Where honesty and
good hounds are a family tradition"
LOUDON RIDGE PATCH
KL Vanosdale
http://www.loudonridgepache.com
Home of the tried and true Patch Hound! "Where honesty and
good hounds are a family tradition"
-
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Rocky Mount, NC
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Wardog you completely missed the point of my post which was when those 3 branches are not following the constitution there is no true law of the land as it can change arbitrarally changed by the president or scotus without going to the congress. Laws are written and passed by congress, signed by the president and Judged constitutional by scotus. That is not how our government is operating therefore it is lawless.
-
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:32 pm
- Location: Warrrensburg, Mo
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Rabbithoundjb wrote:So wardog when you have these guys advertising on this public forum, pups for sale but only to trialers, they are desciminating by your definition right. They don't have a right to choose who they sell that pup too.
No because trialers are not a protected class of Americans and are simply protecting a brand with a preference. If he said, you are a queer so I won't sell you a dog, that is where the laws steps in... Age, race, religion etc... any protected class will ALWAYS be protected by the law.
God isn't real, Beer is good and people are crazy, there I fixed it.
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Mo. Beagler 5000 wrote:Rabbithoundjb wrote:So wardog when you have these guys advertising on this public forum, pups for sale but only to trialers, they are desciminating by your definition right. They don't have a right to choose who they sell that pup too.
No because trialers are not a protected class of Americans and are simply protecting a brand with a preference. If he said, you are a queer so I won't sell you a dog, that is where the laws steps in... Age, race, religion etc... any protected class will ALWAYS be protected by the law.
What about not promoting someone because they are not in a "protected class"? Wonder if Caucasians will become a protected class, once they become a minority.

If this country stays on its present course a "White Male" will have to become disabled or 'Queer" in order to make a job. Do you think a white homosexual community organizer would have a chance at political office.
-
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Mansfield,Ohio
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
You win some,and you lose some,just like in field trialing..
Right now the United States Of America is losing..
We are losing our Religion,sad but true..
I believe in God,We need to get back to that.
Right now the United States Of America is losing..
We are losing our Religion,sad but true..
I believe in God,We need to get back to that.
-
- Posts: 3298
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: ohio
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
United States is not living by the word spoken in the bible they are deterring from it not good!
RABBIT RIDGE KENNELS :
HOME OF:
IFC BEAVER CREEKS KICK AZ
FCGD THOMPSONS TRY MY PATIENCE
OUTBACK MATILDA
RABBIT RIDGE ONE TUFF AZ KICKER
RABBIT RIDGE PARIS
http://rabbitridgekennels.webs.com/
HOME OF:
IFC BEAVER CREEKS KICK AZ
FCGD THOMPSONS TRY MY PATIENCE
OUTBACK MATILDA
RABBIT RIDGE ONE TUFF AZ KICKER
RABBIT RIDGE PARIS
http://rabbitridgekennels.webs.com/
-
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2003 9:58 pm
- Location: greenville pa NW
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
when you put all minorities together they make the majority and the white male becomes the the minority.
COAL HILL KENNELS. LP GR CH Coal Hill's Brush Buster. 2014 PA state champion LP GR CH Coal Hill's Mama Cass. 2010 PA state champion LP R CH GR BCH Coal Hill's Princess Willow HOG DOG POWER!!!!
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Absolutely!hard on a check wrote:You win some,and you lose some,just like in field trialing..
Right now the United States Of America is losing..
We are losing our Religion,sad but true..
I believe in God,We need to get back to that.
SHAKE DOWN BEAGLES
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
The Founding fathers ,Were for the most part were not religious. They made sure that religion was not to be a part of our government . If religion is is failing, I would say that the fault lies with the church. If you like religious law then you could become Muslim . They have Sharia law .
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Wow! I think you need to do some homework on the founding fathers. Our entire legal system was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. Most, if not all of the founding fathers were very religious and incorporated religious belief into the foundation of our country and government. Some of the founding fathers even made statements that the Constitution relies on the American people being moral or the principles set forth in the Constitution can not work. I am not taking sides, but maybe that is the reason why we are having so many issues with what is Constitutional and what is not these days. If we as a society stray from morality our entire system is thrown into chaos because the system was not designed to work that way. If what we have today is not chaos, I don't want to see what real chaos is then. JMO.
-
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:56 pm
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
If everyone would stop bitching about history and put some effort into making the future better we mite get some where.. And stop pointing the finger at people !!
ROLLING KENNELLS
-------HOME of-------
RILEYS ROLLING DIRTY GIRL
RILEYS ROLLING JAZZY J
RILEYS ROLLING MISS DIXIE
-------HOME of-------
RILEYS ROLLING DIRTY GIRL
RILEYS ROLLING JAZZY J
RILEYS ROLLING MISS DIXIE
-
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:30 pm
- Location: Rocky Mount, NC
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Another stupid post by 5000, why am I not surprised. We can discriminate as long as the current law think that group shouldn't be protected from others peoples choices.
-
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:32 pm
- Location: Warrrensburg, Mo
Re: Dogs names not allowed anymore?
Well thank god for for that at least!!!hard on a check wrote:
We are losing our Religion,sad but true...
Is it really hard to get through your thick skull that in America we are a people that are supposed to be FREE!! Free to do whatever we want when we want to do it as long as it doesn't trample on someone elses rights while doing so. Amazing that you "Christians" feel it is okay to tell another human being how they can or can't live their life..... That is literally the EXACT opposite of what they wanted whne our country was founded...Rabbithoundjb wrote:Another stupid post by 5000, why am I not surprised. We can discriminate as long as the current law think that group shouldn't be protected from others peoples choices.
And for the love of god and all that is holy, ourfounding fathers were NOT ANYWHERE near what we mean when we say "Christian" in today's meaning. Sure most of them believed in God and a supreme being but jesus loving hippies, they were not... The fact you guys keep pretending they were is laughable. Go look at their quotes FOR and AGAINST god... There is some pretty awesome ones in there from jefferson adams franklin etc...
God isn't real, Beer is good and people are crazy, there I fixed it.