PKC rule question

A general forum for the discussion of hunting with beagles, guns, clothing and other equipment and just talking dawgs! (Tall tales on hunting allowed, but remember, first liar doesn't stand a chance)

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

pross
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: Waverly, Ohio

Re: PKC rule question

Post by pross »

Exactly right. There has to be 2 minutes elapsed after the first dog was struck in for dog 3 to get points deleted. According to the original post, that did not happen. Per rule 6A

Connie Young
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:20 pm
Location: Peebles, OH

Re: PKC rule question

Post by Connie Young »

GUYS I STAND CORRECTED , I MIS-READ -- THE POST,, I STAND CORRECTECD !!!

Dog #1 - no forward progress will be MINUSED -100
Dog #2 - no forward progress will be MINUSED -75
Dog #3 - WILL BE MUNUSED -50 ALSO..
WE START FROM THE FIRST DOG STRUCK IN AT THE 4 MUINUTE MARK.. AND THERE WAS 1 MINUTE LEFT IN THE HUNT.

CONNIE

Parker7
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: PKC rule question

Post by Parker7 »

Full Throttle wrote:All three dogs will be Minus. If there were four minutes left in the hunt when the first dog struck in The other two dogs are in the same three minutes timeframe as the first dog struck therefore all three dogs would have been minus and there would have been one minute left in the hunt. The third dog struck in one minute and a half from the first dog. If he would have struck after two minutes from the first dogs strike he would have been deleted. Just because the third dog struck in with less than three minutes left in the Hunt does not apply he is still on the timeframe as the first dog.
Good explanation! Sometimes these things can be hard to understand when they are in a gray area. The rule don't make much sense to me because I feel all guilty dogs should take a minus. And why have 100 75 50 and 25 minus,aren't all the dogs equally guilty. I guess the the second cold trailer is not as bad as the first. Lol But we don't write the rules we just follow them. Sorry if that came out a little negative its wasn't my intent to bash the organization just get a clear answer on a confusing situation.
Thanks everybody

Parker7
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: PKC rule question

Post by Parker7 »

Full Throttle wrote:All three dogs will be Minus. If there were four minutes left in the hunt when the first dog struck in The other two dogs are in the same three minutes timeframe as the first dog struck therefore all three dogs would have been minus and there would have been one minute left in the hunt. The third dog struck in one minute and a half from the first dog. If he would have struck after two minutes from the first dogs strike he would have been deleted. Just because the third dog struck in with less than three minutes left in the Hunt does not apply he is still on the timeframe as the first dog.
Good explanation! Sometimes these things can be hard to understand when they are in a gray area. The rule don't make much sense to me because I feel all guilty dogs should take a minus. And why have 100 75 50 and 25 minus,aren't all the dogs equally guilty. I guess the the second cold trailer is not as bad as the first. Lol But we don't write the rules we just follow them. Sorry if that came out a little negative its wasn't my intent to bash the organization just get a clear answer on a confusing situation.
Thanks everybody

User avatar
hskennels69
Posts: 1123
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:39 pm
Location: LOGAN,OHIO 43138

Re: PKC rule question

Post by hskennels69 »

And after much thought I'm wrong!!!!! Had that last dog struck in just over 2 minutes after the first it would have been deleted....Won't be the first won't be the last.....Sorry about that Parker7 I didn't mean to feed you false info I should have read your question more thorough....
Home of:
LP R. CH. UKC DUAL CH. PKC SILVER CHAMPION OLD DIRTY SOUTH PLAYBOY
H&S MUSTANG SALLY

Parker7
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:16 pm

Re: PKC rule question

Post by Parker7 »

AprilD wrote:Parker , we have the same issue in UKC rules. They need rewording too. You should see the debates on some of those questions!
Had a boss years ago that was always telling the younger guys "KEEP IT SIMPLE". That's good advice. Now can I get some help interpreting these instructions for putting the kids swingset together :lol: :lol: :lol:

AprilD
Posts: 162
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:09 pm

Re: PKC rule question

Post by AprilD »

Parker7 wrote:
AprilD wrote:Parker , we have the same issue in UKC rules. They need rewording too. You should see the debates on some of those questions!
Had a boss years ago that was always telling the younger guys "KEEP IT SIMPLE". That's good advice. Now can I get some help interpreting these instructions for putting the kids swingset together :lol: :lol: :lol:
oh darn for that you need to speak chinese.
April D
Grantville, PA

Post Reply