


Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett
The "chocolate babies" have some white genes presenting and some black genes presenting at the same time in different ways. There are no chocolate genes. I bred a mostly white, tri-color bitch with nothing but tricolors behind her to a male with mostly blueticks and some tri-colors behind him. Out of 5 puppies, I got 3 blueticks and 2 Red/whites...not a tricolor in the litter. It may appear that way at times, but it ain't like mixin' paint. The genes have got to be there...somewhere. You either double up on those recessive genes, or you minimize their influence.Bev wrote:Explains why a black a white couple produce chocolate babies.
It is pretty simple to explain. It's all about "odds". When we say that a breeding will produce half red and white and half tri-colored, what we are really saying is that each pup has a 50/50 chance of being either of the two. So in real life it is possible to get 100% of either, or any combination of the two.wvduece wrote:im gonna jump in here n ask a question i asked the same question a few years ago n here im gonna ask it again since the thread is going towards genes ok here it is i had 2 red n white copper nose dogs both real good dogs as far as gun hunting the female was pretty mouthy at TIMES the male was just right with his mouth not too tight n not too loose i asked the question about breeding the two dogs would i get mouthy pups or would i get tight mouth dogs i was told by some that i would get a mix of both some mouthy n some tight--- ok herfe is what i got the pups will be 5 this coming june so here is what i got from breeding 2 different type mouths all of the dogs are tight mouth dogs not any of them have any extra mouth so in 5 years they have developed into what they are tight mouth dogs wheres the mix of loose mouth dogs? by the way they all were red n white copper nose what happened to the loose mouth i almost didnt make the cross because i was afraid i would get mouthy dogs now im glad i made the cross because the pups made real dogs with no extra mouth at all![]()
![]()
jb
That is what I am talking about.S.R.Patch wrote: I'll give you this,...any hound required and tested for 7-8 hr. hard fast hunting, is by nature more correctly built than one who is only required to "give it your best" for an hour at a time overall. Now we're not talking how smooth/rough, controled the hound is, we're talking about freedom of movement for endurance.
I have never heard of this?? Isn't it true that beagles were originally brought over from England where they were run on hare-I seriously doubt they were slow methodical hunters LOL! My goodness, it definitely isn't anything new. Large pack on hare trials have probably been in existence for nearly 100 years-read the book Wilderness Patchwork by Willet Randall and let me know if the faster dogs are a new invention.Well, if we want to get technical, the breed was originally not bred for the hunting style favored in LPO. They were originally a slow, methodical hound, closer to the style of the true medium speed gundog. The faster footed hound has been selectively bred for that speed and this is a relatively modern occurrence in the breed's history.
NOT ALL OF US!Beaglebrit wrote: The show fancy will breed what it takes to win, and follow any fad or style to achieve those wins....hock walking Shepards, Labs so Fat that they would sink any Jon Boat, etc. The trialer will breed what it takes to win....Deep south SPO dogs are now fast and erratic on line and as rough as a cobb....ARHA dogs and UKC....pursue accomplishment with little regard to line control....Brace dogs are all about how slow can you go and their conformation reflects that.
Just something to think about
Betsy
(trying hard to breed something for AKC Show and AKC SPO Field!)
Actually his conformation is NOT that different from a lot of the show Beagles out there. His markings, the big buckle collars and the lack of show grooming are the biggest dead give aways that he's field stock. Picture him as a classic tri, groomed and positioned in a show stack and I am going to say that his size (is he over 15"?) and his tailset may be all that need improving as far as a picky show person like me will notice.SilverZuk wrote: I will post a picture of a dog of mine (He's dead now).
His conformation is obviously not show dog. It would be laughable to compare him to the "Show Standard".
He was 14 3/4" tall. Full size, but not even close to be questionable when measured.Honey Pot Hounds wrote: I hope you got some nice pups out of him before he passed.
That is a nice looking female...Honey Pot Hounds wrote:You telling me this little bitch doesn't look like she could chase a rabbit all day?