Breaking from running deer

A general forum for the discussion of hunting with beagles, guns, clothing and other equipment and just talking dawgs! (Tall tales on hunting allowed, but remember, first liar doesn't stand a chance)

Moderators: Pike Ridge Beagles, Aaron Bartlett

New York Hillbilly
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: Soldotna, Alaska

Post by New York Hillbilly »

Joe,
I have been away for a couple of days from this post because I have been busy. I wanted to say however as far as New York and Hillbilly being contrary, you may be right. But it is what my Ohio buddy Paul Webb started calling me and it stuck. Soon others would refer to me in the same manner when they saw me at trials. The idea that New York is home only to city slickers is a misinformed notion. Paul was shocked to see the pictures of where I call home. The property I own is about 200 acres of woods, fields and scrub apple orchard. Our land is a stones throw away from approx 8000 acres of state land and is linked to 1000's of private acres of land just like mine. Lots of hills (Hillbilly), a 12 mile long swamp called NINE MILE swamp (go figgure) and endless bean and corn fields. We have deer, turkeys, rabbits, hare and every other critter you could hope to chase, or hope not to. :lol: A good number of the folks I have met call themselves country folk but actually find themselves in what we would call the suburbs. They have to worry about neighbors squawking about the hounds they keep in the backyard. Here, we have more animals than people. As a matter of fact the local high school and mobile home factory close every opening day of deer season cause they know nobody will show up anyway. THIS is no kidding! It seems urban sprawl is moving in on many people in places they never encountered it. Not so here! That is why I can put my hounds on deer at any moment I wish. They never feel I am setting them up because they encounter them everytime we take to the field anyway. It is only that when we go out for deer class I am there for a reason other than to run rabbits. As far as they are concerned we are looking for bunnies. I am sure there are people out there who have hounds that have never taken a deer and I am glad for them. As I said I was one of those guys for years and years till I brought in a young hound that would not listen to JUST SAY NO! :shock: It took some drastic lessons quick to make it stop. I walked away from that experience a little wiser and a whole lot more humble. Hounds are hounds are hounds and nobody will ever convince me that any hound will "never" take off game. If the hound dies having never done it I guess you can make the claim, but until that moment in time anything is possible. They are however hounds not humans and they are born to hunt and chase and will at time do some pretty unexpected things. I learned that with hounds like everything else in life that the only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain. I am not that bull headed or cocky to think that I have all the answers, and I learn new things all the time. But like my hounds with the E-collars on I too learn, and sometimes it takes something as "shocking" as my hounds pounding a deer off into the distance to get my attention. For those who have never been on a deer run with their hounds, you are lucky and I wish you continued deer free running. But don't you be "shocked" if and when your naturally trash free hounds do it! Cause I won't be!!
NYH
PS, I still think shaking your hound around will make it wary of you.
I do not subscribe to beating kids or hounds and I do neither. I expect them to do what I feel are stupid things now and then so I am not surprised. But they both know even when they screw up they can safely come to me. And just because mother hound shakes her pup to teach it (I have never seen this) why should I do it? She also licks and sniff there backsides to stimulate them to go to the bathroom and to keep them clean bet you won't find me doing it! :lol: :lol:
Peace,
NYH
When my life on earth is ended....this is all I'm gonna say...Lord I've been a hard working pilgrim on the way!

wingpatch
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:53 pm

????

Post by wingpatch »

N.Y. Hillbilly
I have had dogs for awhile and i have yet to see one shake her pups less she was a bad mother and was trying to kill them.
I have seen as i am sure you have, them snap at pups for doing something she did'nt like. I am sure Joe has good results with his method.
I will not put anyones ideas down to them. And i will not say this or that is the way to do it, less someone ask.
Fact is i think i might try catching the next dog of mine that is doing something wrong and biting them real hard.
Wingpatch

AlabamaSwamper
Posts: 810
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 7:06 pm
Location: Florence, AL
Contact:

Post by AlabamaSwamper »

I agree with Big Dog. He more or less said it all. However, give me any dog, all the dogs as pups and you won't find a born trash free dog in the whole bunch. Like Big Dog said, its all in exposure. I welcome anyone that claims to have a trash free line to send some young dogs down here. If they won't start on deer by a year old and will run rabbits, then I will gladly pay top dollar for them. Wait now, if they do run deer by a year old then you owe me top dollar and you get them back.
"No stronger bond exist than that between a man and his dog."

Link to RabbitDawg board. (Old Southernbeagles board)
http://www.excoboard.com/exco/index.php?boardid=6643

snowshoehareguide
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 7:52 pm
Location: brownington vermont

Post by snowshoehareguide »

clippy wrote:i can tell you there are dogs naturally broke i own 2 that are and one is 7 and 3 ive jumped deer in front of them and other dogs have started them and they have came back to me....there are more broke from collars and methods than naturally strait but there are some out there and id garantee it i dont give a crap what state your in weather its alabama or ohio argue all you want i can tell ya your wrong....deer smell the same..clippy
clippy i dont argue a bit thats theres dogs that have never run deer. ive had dogs here that never ran deer.. ive also had dogs run their first deer when they were 8 years old.. now i didnt think an 8 year old dog that had been clean her whole life would run a deer but she did.. broke her with a shock collar and she never ran another and i hunted her till she was 11-12 . now i felt alot like you do about your 7 year old. i have very little problem with beagles running trash because deer yard here and i avoid them until dog has run a lot of hare, on bare ground i start with an older dog... what i havent seen is dogs anybody can say will not run trash cause theyre born that way.. i see some strains of dogs a lot easier than others.

clippy

Post by clippy »

well i dont think ill have that problem....theyve been jumped in front of him and other dogs have run em and hes turned around and came back...

User avatar
Joe West
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 5:18 am

Post by Joe West »

Breagles have a tendancy towards timidity. It's in the breed. This timidity is seen in different ways. If a hound is beaten he will show lasting signs of it. All one need to to is move your hand at his face as if you were going to slap him and you will know instantly if the hound were ever beaten. If he has never been beaten he will just look at you wagging his tail. If he has been beaten his reaction can cover a wide range of reactions but, he WILL have a reaction. He could just blink his eyes and duck, he could roll on his back and whimper and beg forgiveness, He could duck and try to crawl onto your lap to beg forgiveness, He could cry out as if in pain even though you haven't struck him, He could run and hide, salivate heavily, shake uncontrolably, or all three at the same time, he could be manshy or manshy of the person who beat him. All of these things and more are the signs that the hound has suffered a traumatic event.

Nothing short of a traumatic event can make a hound leave a hot line when no command to do so is given. Many beaglers who use the shock collar are seeing these signs whether they recognize them as signs of a traumatic event or not. Hounds are running and hideing when deer are encountered. They will beg forgiveness from their handlers, some will shake or salivate and others will merely startel when deer scent is encountered. It depends not only on the severity of the shock administered but also on the individual hound involved. That is, some hounds are more sensitive then others.

As handlers one of the most basic and imortant things we must do is to guard against subjecting hounds to traumatic events because a single traumatic event COULD ruin the hound or prevent him from ever reaching his full potential or at the vary least set him back for a while. But make no mistake about it; if the hound is showing any signs of suffering a traumatic event he COULD be set back, ruined, or simply never reach his full potential. IN the case of a young hound you never know what his full potential is until he reaches it so experianced handlers always avoid traumatic events knowing that if the traumatic event is responcible for the hound never makeing the grade they will never know it; they will only know that the hound never made the grade. Some hounds who would have been top hounds will now be only passable and hounds who would have been passable are now culls.

That is NOT to say that only the shock collar causes this in hounds; ANY traumatic event can have this effect on hounds. A Beating, a coyote attack while running, Going over board with the shakeing method, or just anything that traumatizes the hound. A couple of days ago I had a hound fall off a forty foot cliff while running a rabbit onto the rocks below. He was only slightly injured but now I have to worry about the effects it might have on him. A good argument for line control too but that's another story.

So now fellow beaglers you know why I won't use a shock collar. Not that it absolutely will ruin them but just that it COULD ruin them or prevent them from reaching their full potential. The signs are there for all to see. Some of you won't care because in the end the collar is easier for you. Some will argue that if the hound were running deer he'd be ruined anyway and that argument has it's merits. But, my take on that argument is to breed hounds who are easily trained NOT to run deer. If we do that we won't have a need for the shock collar. Others will say that they see no signs of traumatic events in their hounds. If one rereads some of the posts here on this thread you will find beaglers descibeing these signs in their own hounds so there is no doubt that beaglers are seeing these signs of traumatic events in their hounds associated with the shock collar. IN the end the question each must ask himself is, is the potential harm and trauma to the hound the shock collar causes worth the ease of it's use? For me it is not; and I don't beleive it is in the best interest of the hounds. "You can never be a good handler until you learn to put the welfare of the hounds ahead of your own."

wingpatch
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:53 pm

????

Post by wingpatch »

Joe tell us just how would you go about breaking a dog off deer.
Friend in sport.?....Wingpatch
Last edited by wingpatch on Thu Jun 19, 2003 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chris
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 7:10 pm
Location: Great North Woods of NH
Contact:

Post by Chris »

Joe West wrote:"You can never be a good handler until you learn to put the welfare of the hounds ahead of your own."
I couldn't find much fault with anything you said, until the above line. I love my dogs like very close friends, but they're a tool for hunting, above all else -- same as my shotgun, or my favorite hunting coat, or my tracking system. If any of my equipment becomes defective (running off-game, being obstinent, etc.), then I would try and fix it the best I could. If I couldn't easily fix it then I'd find an alternative -- that means putting my welfare over theirs. I'm not going to have my hunting coat sewn by hand when we've got electric sewing machines -- and I'm not going to put myself through hell to save one out of 74 dogs that might get so upset at a shock that he'd be useless. To each his own, but to me your method just isn't practical.
Chris

www.MillerOutdoors.com
www.Facebook.com/milleroutdoors1
www.YouTube.com/c/MillerOutdoors1
Instagram @milleroutdoors1
Twitter @milleroutdoors

User avatar
Joe West
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2002 5:18 am

Post by Joe West »

Wingpatch: It wouldn't make sense to you.

Chris: Let me simplify it for you.

Do what's best for the hounds even though it may be more difficult for you. And let me stress do whats best for the hounds. Hounds aren't coats or guns or any inanimate object they are living breathing feeling animals. Treat them like a throw away object and that's what you'll get.

Beagleman973
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 11:28 am
Location: Southern Illinois

Post by Beagleman973 »

I don't agree with everything Joe wrote, I do use a shock collar from time to time, but I'm extremely selective and careful in using it. I ONLY use for off-game and I always make sure the hound knows that I was the one correcting him.

But, unlike Chris, I do agree with Joe about putting the hounds welfare over your own. I interpret it somewhat different than Chris did I think. To me dogs are more than just a tool to go hunting with. They are my companions and friends. Chris I know you said this also, but then you said they were also a tool, which I guess they are, but they are also much, much more than that.

I would rather have less hounds where I can devote more time to them, than have so many where I don't care if I ruin one or not. A hound that truly loves and cares for you will hunt harder for you than one that won't. They will run until they just fall over dead if you let them.

You have to put their welfare first!!! Whether it's knowing when they've run enough, hot weather for instance, not putting them in bad situations like running younger hounds with a hot pack that could cause them to over reach and become faulty. After hunting all day and I'm bone tired, I care for the hounds first when I get home. Fresh water, food, etc. The first place I go when I get home from work is the kennels to see the hounds.

Keeping, training, and hunting hounds is a huge responsibility!!! Each and every one of them depends on you to take care of them. All of my hounds give me their best each and every time I have them out. Some days that best is better than others. How can I do anything else but give them my best. That means care, medicine, a clean home, food, water, and making sure I don't destroy or ruin that hound because I was over zealous with correcting him......or just not caring because I have 70+ other hounds to deal with.
If you can't run with the BIG DOGS stay on the porch!

User avatar
Chris
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 7:10 pm
Location: Great North Woods of NH
Contact:

Post by Chris »

Beagleman973, my point is to say that the use of shock collars on Beagles ruins them isn't accurate. It can, but so can a lot of other things that a dipstick might overdo or use in anger.

I pointed out that I love my hounds like close friends. I don't keep 70 hounds, I keep between 5 and 12, because, even running them 2 or 3 days per week in the off season and hunitng them over 100 days during gunning season, I can't do justice to any more than that at one time.

If one gets so attached to a dog that he can't do what's necessary (cull, correct or whatever) the objectivity is lost and we'll be forever stuck with whatever hounds got here first because we'd never do anything uncomfortable for a hound. Don't confuse what I'm advocating, via shock collar use, as abuse or mistreatment or neglect or anything else negative. It's not that way at all. What I do mean is that if using shock collars on dogs means that I don't put their welfare above my own, then I guess I don't -- but, I can live with that. If my dogs were interviewed about their life I suspect it'd be a pretty pleasing story for you all to hear -- shock collar use included -- it's simply not as traumatic as some lead you to believe.
Chris

www.MillerOutdoors.com
www.Facebook.com/milleroutdoors1
www.YouTube.com/c/MillerOutdoors1
Instagram @milleroutdoors1
Twitter @milleroutdoors

User avatar
Bev
Site Admin
Posts: 4406
Joined: Sun May 19, 2002 12:18 pm
Location: Indpls., IN
Contact:

Post by Bev »

Don't let yourself believe that Chris is the big-bad boogeyman with his hounds. He's been to my home with them before and I'm here to tell you the man baby-talks to his hounds and loves 'em up a lot, lol! But, he expects his hounds to handle for him to a degree that most of us never aspire for. He is also willing to give them the individual time they need early on - he puts a ton of hours on his pups before they ever see the field.

The two days they were here, he never hooked a lead to any of them and I live in the city of Indianapolis. They all wear the e-collars AND tracking collars, they obey his voice and if they should lose their heads for a minute, a tickle of the e-collar was all that was necessary to get them to pay attention again. When they did, he rewarded with affection and praise. They'd wag their tails and look at him like "Yeah, I know Dad - I'm a good girl". Completely unaffected by the tickle. I have no doubt that when you consider what tragedies can happen to dogs that don't obey, Chris puts the welfare of his hounds first. He always knows where they are and they always know where he is.

I was impressed at how bold, friendly and outgoing his girls were. There wasn't a shy hair on those dogs and they seemed well-adjusted, very adaptable, not geeked-out at all by new surroundings of a big noisy city. I might add that when we were in the field, you should have seen those girls tackle their first experience on cottontail! They hunted hard and you could almost hear the gears turning as they were trying figure out why that goofy rabbit twisted and turned so much, lol!

I think Chris's ability to maintain objectivity makes his e-collar training very effective because he applies it with thought and not emotion. This objectivity in turn is passed to his hounds - they keep those corrections in perspective, and know that it's much more fun to please their owner than not.

Sorry to talk out of school on ya Chris, but I was so impressed at the results of your training, I'm jealous. You've managed to harness the purpose of the e-collar to where it's a win-win situation for both you and your hounds. :thumbsup:

wingpatch
Posts: 220
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2003 4:53 pm

Post by wingpatch »

Seriously Joe tell us.
Seeing that is what this topic was about.
We all might exchange some ideas and metods that we can put with our own to really help each other.
Wingpatch .

ACOMEAU
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 8:35 pm
Location: Wentworth NH

Post by ACOMEAU »

First of all I am amazed that some of you have bitten off this topic again, knowing full well how it would play out. Some of you are veterans in this discussion with Joe West, tisk tisk. Its like Adrian in Rocky 4 " YOU CAN"T WIN ROCKY"
Take a Kid Hunting and Fishing

Phillip Smith

Post by Phillip Smith »

Joe, all I've got to say is I can't beleive you can say write so many words and not say anything! I'm sure there may be some truth in some of what you say but for the most part It's a crook of bull. Your not talking to a bunch of kids but experinced hound men with years of experince. Some a lot more then me. You haven't given one thread of evidence that you have any knowledge about how a shock collar works. Maybe if you had some experinces with shock collars then you might be beleiveable. This is my last post to anything you have a comment on because your clueless!!! Your not worhty of another reply!
Bev, I agree with you 100% on what you are saying about Chris's dogs. That is the way mine is. I almost never carry a lead and my dog are very happy, bold out going dogs. Some of mine were 3 years old before they ever had a shock collar on. It sure didn't set them back just made them more pleasure to be around and hunt. It's been fun!

Post Reply