If Fredom Run Jack had only sired culls who would have bred to him?If he hadn't gotten to the right trials, he may never have became FTC, but then again, we could go the other way and say, "does a name make the hound or does a hound make the name"?
Patch, I see where you're going here, but I think you have missed my entire point. I can take Jack to the trials all day long, but
I cannot make him a good reproducer. The Krpans did that. I can put a FC title on Jack, but not necessarily the 39+ dogs out of him. The genetics gets the credit. Years from now, when Jack shows up 9 times in a pedigree, that piece of paper does not tell who the breeder/owner/handler of Jack was. Only the kennel name that appears will allude to that. If he had sired only culls, it reverts back to what Mark T summed up: Live and die by your kennel name. If you own it's successes, you should be willing to own it's failures.
You buy it, you name it whatever the heck you want. If it was good enough to have your name on it, then why are you selling it? Seems like people want free advertising and credit for making a dog after the fact.
As far as changing a name, I'd never do it.
So then you are in agreement with those of us who don't like the new rule, because we are talking about changing an
already named dog, not an unnamed puppy. I think most of us agree about a puppy that is sold by a breeder, and if the breeder has not specified, nor cares to, their kennel name. I bought a pup one time and the litter owner put just his kennel name on the papers, i.e Frenchman's... and I added the call name I wanted. That was his perogative, his right, and I didn't have to agree to it. If putting my own kennel name on it meant so much to me that it became the deal breaker, I would just pass on the puppy.