New Format
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:04 pm
Dont have all the details worked out just yet but this is it in a nut shell.
It is to put money back into the trialers pocket, it cost so much now days to do anything, it would be better to give money back insted of plastic trophy's.
These are all just numbers but I will do this to give you an idea of whats cooking.
40 opens, you pay a $25.00 entry fee to hunt, pay the first place dog 10% of the total 2nd place 9% and so on.
40 dogs at $25.00 = 1,000 so
1st @ 10% would make 100
2nd @ 9% would make 90
3rd @ 8% would make 80
4th @ 7% would make 70
all the way back to tenth would drop 10 bucks
then you have the champs just pay the top 3 dogs
20 champs at $25.00
1st @ 15% would make $75.00
2nd @ 13% would make $65.00
3rd @ 10% would make $50.00
Then the grands pay back top 3 dogs but pay them a little more, say there is only 5 grands, dip into your over all money and pay them a little better
1st @ 100.00
2nd @ 75.00
3rd @ 50.00.
That still left the club with $515.00 to either pay judges or to pay a little better pay outs, that would be totally up to the clubs on their pay out, I just think it would help the guys to put a little gas money back into their pockets, and for the big hunts this could turn into some pretty good money for the trialers.
All this is still in early stages just thot I would throw that out there to get a few comments on, I know there is going to be the comment, if money is involved cheating will only get worse, well if you get caught cheating you are banned for a year 2nd offence your out for good, and if you smell fish your just on probation.
Let me know what you guys think.
I would rather just go with AKC but then what are you going to do with the guys that have hunted grade dogs for all these years, I dont think it is worth punishing them for not having AKC dogs.
Like I said all this is just in its early stages, slam away I have broad shoulders, and Danny could you and Ramey do a spell check for me because I know I have some mistakes in there. LOL
It is to put money back into the trialers pocket, it cost so much now days to do anything, it would be better to give money back insted of plastic trophy's.
These are all just numbers but I will do this to give you an idea of whats cooking.
40 opens, you pay a $25.00 entry fee to hunt, pay the first place dog 10% of the total 2nd place 9% and so on.
40 dogs at $25.00 = 1,000 so
1st @ 10% would make 100
2nd @ 9% would make 90
3rd @ 8% would make 80
4th @ 7% would make 70
all the way back to tenth would drop 10 bucks
then you have the champs just pay the top 3 dogs
20 champs at $25.00
1st @ 15% would make $75.00
2nd @ 13% would make $65.00
3rd @ 10% would make $50.00
Then the grands pay back top 3 dogs but pay them a little more, say there is only 5 grands, dip into your over all money and pay them a little better
1st @ 100.00
2nd @ 75.00
3rd @ 50.00.
That still left the club with $515.00 to either pay judges or to pay a little better pay outs, that would be totally up to the clubs on their pay out, I just think it would help the guys to put a little gas money back into their pockets, and for the big hunts this could turn into some pretty good money for the trialers.
All this is still in early stages just thot I would throw that out there to get a few comments on, I know there is going to be the comment, if money is involved cheating will only get worse, well if you get caught cheating you are banned for a year 2nd offence your out for good, and if you smell fish your just on probation.
Let me know what you guys think.
I would rather just go with AKC but then what are you going to do with the guys that have hunted grade dogs for all these years, I dont think it is worth punishing them for not having AKC dogs.
Like I said all this is just in its early stages, slam away I have broad shoulders, and Danny could you and Ramey do a spell check for me because I know I have some mistakes in there. LOL