well,this saturday,i was in a cast,the judge was on the cell phone talking to his girlfriend and a mutual friend of mine and his,and he was text messaging people the entire hour,in the meantime,judging our dogs by ear,and admitted he was judging by ear,he says,"i have ran dogs long enough to tell when a check is a check by ear.
i protested the cast,the other handler was goin to protest also,but changed his mind when his dog came back the winner by 10 points

the moh ruled against me cause the judge said he was not talkin on the cell,only texting

talking,texting,what is the difference?the judge admitted he was not using the celol to keep time,and did not have a medical emergency or anything,so,should the cast have been re ran?
rules are rules is what i have always been told,and i also believe that if you cant see the check,dont score it.judgeing by ear is not fair with all the mouthy dogs out there.
so what is your opinion?
was it a rule violation?