( Some might well conclude that he has not passed on his top qualities to his offspring and is not the most prepotent of stud dogs
Well, I think we can negate that one.
CH Kahootz Chase Manhatton
Quote:
Ben has made his mark in beagle history, both in the ring and as a producer of top dogs. Beagle of the year in 97,98 and 99, Ben´s career record includes 341 BOVs, 132 Group Ones, 8 BISS and 29 All breed BIS making hime the top winning beagle dog in US history.
Ben, Chase Manhattan was certainly well handled, managed etc. and had resources behind him that all of us could envy. (My estimate, at least 50 thousand plus per year.) I saw him many times, and showed against him both before and after he finished his Ch. and the interest in him was bought by his current owners. While he had a remarkable record I also know of at least one litter he sired when bred to a field bred bitch that though the breeder kept until well over 6 months old and tried to start them on rabbits, eventually gave it up and offered the pups with papers free to anyone that would come and get them. (By the way to clarify a bit, while I can admire his owners/handlers etc. for what they accomplished and the hounds incredible record, all should recognize that they know the "game" very well and also how "to play" to reach thier goals. That is OK. I do not have any problem with that. However, I am not a fan of Ben's. He was/is far to short and blocky, lacked neck, over done head, too deep bodied, over boned and was not up on leg, lacked enough air under him to suit my taste and observation of the kind of conformation needed for long endurance and run to catch speed and drive.) My opinion only.
Congrats on the major. It is a very nice win indeed. Just wondering if you would have thought as highly of the judge if you had not won??? or if the outcome for the judging at the Nationals is different, will that mean the judge there is bad. One bad, one good, both actually good, both bad!!!, but results that may differ, not only from day to to day but even under the same judges at a different event. It does amaze. (With hold ribbons one day, win a major under same a couple months later. or try withheld ribbon one day and win with same dog 4 point major the next (different judge obviously) over the exact same entry. Or........ on and on. The AKC ring still amazes and amuses me.
While most judges will have thier assignments already set for the next several months, it would be interesting to see if in the years ahead this judge is again selected for a speciality or for that matter if thier bookings as a beagle judge remain fairly consistent with the past. In some cases, while the fancy applauds at ringside the disapproval or approval of picking the veteran (I would have loved to had hidden mikes in hotel/motel rooms, over dinner, grooming area, or monitored phone calls etc.) thier real approval/disapproval may well be reflected by how often this judge gets assignments in the future. In some cases, actions/awards/methodolgy etc. at a very big show or speciality can virtually doom or make a judges career with the fancy in a breed. I have no idea how it will go, but we might look to the past, such as previous instances of veterans picking up various Bests at a speciality or possibly feedback regarding a judges method etc. as a guide. I have never made an actual count or anything like that, but do have a certain intuitive feel for the way the wind my blow or has blown in some instances. (My current partners and former partner both served for many years on judge selection committees for thier all-breed clubs, just as do many in the beagle show fancy today. Thier future choices/selection plus the size of entry a judge draws in the future will actually be the final judgement of what a judge has done in the past.)