To Out or Not to Out

[allniter]

I will agree PIKE RIDGE ---About a dog deal --see it run ---like I say you might like a skinny lady --I like a good fat cook --we are both right in our own think ---but when it come to someone selling something that didn't work or broking ---after you sent the money he never sent the product that you were buying --those people should be HIGH LITED --Of course their are always two side to the story

[JStorer]

Perhaps someone could come up with a plan similar to a barter system that they have in the Middle East where a man in Texas could sell something to a man in Michigan and have a 3rd. party hold the money until satisfaction is achieved.

Bob

OR just cut there hand off when someone steals from us like they do there too!

[Bunnyblaster]

The only thing I would say is I agree there are always 2 sides to a story so outing someone should be done in a place and a fashion where they can see it and defend it if they choose to. Other than that if you're a crook then as far as I'm concerned you'll get what's coming to you.

I was told by many guys to be up front and honest when dealing with beagles which is fine because I'm that kind of a guy anyway. But they said it doesn't take long to ruin your name and reputation but it takes forever to get it back and they are right.

[bucks better beagles]

Bunny, so true. I have never intentionally wronged anyone but, if they feel I have, they need only tell me and I will try to make it right. The problem in the dog world is communication and experience. If a person references a dog and it is an honest reference to the best of their ability and this dog is sold, The buyer may or not interpret the reference as it was intended. This is not dishonesty, only a failure to communicate. That is why there should always be a trial period.

Bob